Engl 102 Forum 8 AMU/APUS

Engl 102 Forum 8 AMU/APUS


I
Asked by 3 years ago
0 points

Unlike the Toulmin and Rogerian methods where one side is argued over another, the middle ground argument mediates between two sides of an issue, finding a middle ground solution. In other words, this argumentative position seeks to forward a compromise solution between two positions.

For this discussion, choose an issue that you wrote about previously in this course (either your Toulmin or Rogerian essay). Let the class know your previous claim and briefly how you proved this claim in your essay. After this brief review discussion, discuss how you would have approached this particular topic if you were to write a middle ground argument, instead of a Toulmin or Rogerian argument. Would you have adjusted your claim? If so, what sort of adjustment would you need? Would you have to find additional sources about your topic in order to prove this new claim? Is a middle ground solution a more practical solution to your chosen issue?

Engl 102
Islandbuilt

1 Answer

I
Answered by 3 years ago
0 points

Oh Snap! This Answer is Locked

Engl 102 Forum 8 AMU/APUS

Thumbnail of first page

Excerpt from file: ThetopicIchosetowriteaboutformyRogerianessayisbanonplasticbags.Ifiguredthat thiswouldbeagreattopictotalkabout,becauseitwasdifferentanditissomethingthatisnot quitetalkedabout.AfterconductingseveralresearchesonthetopicIfoundgreatinformation

Filename: engl-102-forum-8-28.docx

Filesize: < 2 MB

Downloads: 2

Print Length: 1 Pages/Slides

Words: NA

Your Answer

Surround your text in *italics* or **bold**, to write a math equation use, for example, $x^2+2x+1=0$ or $$\beta^2-1=0$$

Use LaTeX to type formulas and markdown to format text. See example.

Sign up or Log in

  • Answer the question above my logging into the following networks
Sign in
Sign in
Sign in

Post as a guest

  • Your email will not be shared or posted anywhere on our site
  •  

Stats
Views: 20
Asked: 3 years ago

Related